# Rainfall Radar > A model to predict water depth data from rainfall radar information. This is the 3rd major version of this model. Unfortunately using this model is rather complicated and involves a large number of steps. There is no way around this. This README (will) explain it the best I can though. ## System Requirements - Linux (Windows *may* work but is untested. You will probably have a bad day if you use Windows) - Node.js (a *recent* version - i.e. v16+ - the version in the default Ubuntu repositories is too old) - Python 3.8+ - Nvidia GPU (16GiB RAM+ is **strongly recommended**) + CUDA and CuDNN (see [this table](https://www.tensorflow.org/install/source#gpu) for which versions you need) - Experience with the command line - 1TiB disk space free - Lots of time and patience ## Overview The process of using this model is as follows. 1. Apply for access to [CEDA's 1km rainfall radar dataset](https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/27dd6ffba67f667a18c62de5c3456350) 2. Obtain rainfall radar data (use [`nimrod-data-downloader`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/nimrod-data-downloader)) 3. Obtain a heightmap (or *Digital Elevation Model*, as it's sometimes known) from the Ordnance Survey (can't remember the link, please PR to add this) 4. Use [`terrain50-cli`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/terrain50-cli) to slice the the output from steps #2 and #3 to be exactly the same size [TODO: Preprocess to extract just a single river basin from the data] 5. Push through [HAIL-CAESAR](*https://github.com/sbrl/HAIL-CAESAR) (this fork has the ability to handle streams of .asc files rather than each time step having it's own filename) 6. Use `rainfallwrangler` in this repository (finally!) to convert the output to .json.gz then .tfrecord files 7. Pretrain a contrastive learning model 8. Encode the rainfall radar data with the contrastive learning model you pretrained 9. Train the *actual* model to predict water depth Only steps #6 to #9 actually use code in this repository. ## rainfallwrangler `rainfallwrangler` is a Node.js application to wrangle the dataset into something more appropriate for training an AI efficiently. The rainfall radar and water depth data are considered temporally to be regular time steps. Here's a diagram explaining the terminology: ``` NOW │ │ │Water depth │▼ Rainfall Radar Data ▼│[Offset] │▼ ├─┬─┬─┬─┬─┬─┬─┬─┬─┬─┬─┬─┼─┬─┬─┬─┬─┼─┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┼─┴─┴─┴─┴─┴─┘ │ ◄────────── Timesteps ─────────────► ``` Note to self: 150.12 hashes/sec on i7-4770 4c8t, ???.?? hashes/sec on Viper compute After double checking, rainfallwrangler does NOT mess with the ordering of the data.